[Mobile health in primary care. New challenges in the development of solutions to promote physical activity and well-being]. / La salud móvil en atención primaria. Nuevos desafíos en el desarrollo de soluciones para promover la actividad física y el bienestar.

The use of smart devices such as mobile phones (smartphones) or smart watches (smartwatch) to promote physical activity and well-being has increased in recent years among patients and professionals in primary care. This change is driven by the access of patients and professionals to a large catalog of health applications, which can complement the provision of services and promote the empowerment of patients in their own health and lifestyles. These applications are beginning to be integrated with areas such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and data storage in the cloud, among other emerging technological systems, offering a new complementary approach to clinical practice known so far. Despite the great potential, there are numerous limitations and major challenges for its full implementation in clinical practice.

Estudio transversal multicéntrico sobre la prevalencia de delirium en unidades de ortogeriatría: protocolo de «Estudio DELFRA 24» / Multicenter cross-sectional study on the prevalence of delirium in orthogeriatric units: «DELFRA 24 study» protocol

Introducción El delirium es la complicación perioperatoria más frecuente en el adulto mayor con fractura de cadera (FC) conllevando un impacto catastrófico en su recuperación funcional y su estado cognitivo. Actualmente se desconoce la prevalencia real de este síndrome ya que no está protocolizada su detección y abordaje en la práctica clínica habitual. Métodos Se realizará un estudio observacional multicéntrico de tipo transversal a nivel nacional en el que participarán distintas unidades de ortogeriatría de España. Se evaluará la prevalencia de delirium con la escala 4AT, así como las características de este y su relación con otros síndromes geriátricos, variables sociodemográficas, características de la cirugía y parámetros analíticos. Resultados La recogida de datos se llevará a cabo el próximo día mundial del delirium (miércoles 13 de marzo de 2024), por lo que los resultados se esperan durante el segundo o tercer trimestre del año 2024. Conclusiones Conocer la prevalencia real y las características del delirium en mayores con FC podría contribuir a sensibilizar en la detección sistemática, la prevención y el abordaje protocolizado del delirium en servicios quirúrgicos, disminuyendo el impacto de sus consecuencias. (AU)

Introduction Delirium is the most common perioperative complication in older adults with hip fracture (HF), leading to a catastrophic impact on their functional recovery and cognitive status. Currently, the true prevalence of this syndrome is unknown as its detection and management are not standardized in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter observational cross-sectional study will be conducted nationwide, involving different orthogeriatric units in Spain. The prevalence of delirium will be assessed using the 4AT scale, along with its characteristics and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes, sociodemographic variables, surgical characteristics, and laboratory parameters. Results Data collection is scheduled to take place on World Delirium Day (Wednesday, March 13, 2024), and therefore, the results are expected during the second or third quarter of 2024. Conclusions Understanding the real prevalence and characteristics of delirium in older adults with HF could contribute to the development of strategies for its detection and management, reducing the impact of its consequences. (AU)

Estudio transversal multicéntrico sobre la prevalencia de delirium en unidades de ortogeriatría: protocolo de «Estudio DELFRA 24» / Multicenter cross-sectional study on the prevalence of delirium in orthogeriatric units: «DELFRA 24 study» protocol

Introducción El delirium es la complicación perioperatoria más frecuente en el adulto mayor con fractura de cadera (FC) conllevando un impacto catastrófico en su recuperación funcional y su estado cognitivo. Actualmente se desconoce la prevalencia real de este síndrome ya que no está protocolizada su detección y abordaje en la práctica clínica habitual. Métodos Se realizará un estudio observacional multicéntrico de tipo transversal a nivel nacional en el que participarán distintas unidades de ortogeriatría de España. Se evaluará la prevalencia de delirium con la escala 4AT, así como las características de este y su relación con otros síndromes geriátricos, variables sociodemográficas, características de la cirugía y parámetros analíticos. Resultados La recogida de datos se llevará a cabo el próximo día mundial del delirium (miércoles 13 de marzo de 2024), por lo que los resultados se esperan durante el segundo o tercer trimestre del año 2024. Conclusiones Conocer la prevalencia real y las características del delirium en mayores con FC podría contribuir a sensibilizar en la detección sistemática, la prevención y el abordaje protocolizado del delirium en servicios quirúrgicos, disminuyendo el impacto de sus consecuencias. (AU)

Introduction Delirium is the most common perioperative complication in older adults with hip fracture (HF), leading to a catastrophic impact on their functional recovery and cognitive status. Currently, the true prevalence of this syndrome is unknown as its detection and management are not standardized in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter observational cross-sectional study will be conducted nationwide, involving different orthogeriatric units in Spain. The prevalence of delirium will be assessed using the 4AT scale, along with its characteristics and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes, sociodemographic variables, surgical characteristics, and laboratory parameters. Results Data collection is scheduled to take place on World Delirium Day (Wednesday, March 13, 2024), and therefore, the results are expected during the second or third quarter of 2024. Conclusions Understanding the real prevalence and characteristics of delirium in older adults with HF could contribute to the development of strategies for its detection and management, reducing the impact of its consequences. (AU)

[Multicenter cross-sectional study on the prevalence of delirium in orthogeriatric units: «DELFRA 24 study¼ protocol]. / Estudio transversal multicéntrico sobre la prevalencia de delirium en unidades de ortogeriatría: protocolo de «Estudio DELFRA 24¼.

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is the most common perioperative complication in older adults with hip fracture (HF), leading to a catastrophic impact on their functional recovery and cognitive status. Currently, the true prevalence of this syndrome is unknown as its detection and management are not standardized in clinical practice. METHODS: A multicenter observational cross-sectional study will be conducted nationwide, involving different orthogeriatric units in Spain. The prevalence of delirium will be assessed using the 4AT scale, along with its characteristics and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes, sociodemographic variables, surgical characteristics, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Data collection is scheduled to take place on World Delirium Day (Wednesday, March 13, 2024), and therefore, the results are expected during the second or third quarter of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the real prevalence and characteristics of delirium in older adults with HF could contribute to the development of strategies for its detection and management, reducing the impact of its consequences.

Impact of major osteoporotic fractures on the use of healthcare resources in Catalonia, Spain.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the impact of first major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) on health resource use and healthcare expenditures in people aged ≥50 years in Catalonia, Spain. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective study. The Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS) registry was used to obtain sociodemographic, clinical and expenditure data from all public centres in Catalonia (Spain). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Males and females aged ≥50 years who sustained a first major osteoporotic fracture between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. METHODS: Data on admissions to the emergency department, hospitalization and skilled nursing facilities, primary and specialized care visits, nonemergency medical transport, outpatient rehabilitation and pharmacy prescriptions were retrieved for each patient. Monthly and yearly mean usage rates, expenditure in euros (€) and incremental costs one and two years after fracture were calculated. RESULTS: There were 64,403 patients with first MOF: 47,555 females and 16,848 males with a mean age (standard deviation) of 76.5 (12.0) years. The average annual expenditure increased from €4564 in the year before to €12,331 in the year following a hip fracture. For forearm fractures, the expenditure increased from €2511 to €4251, for vertebral fractures from €4146 to €6659, for pelvic fractures from €4442 to €7124, for humerus fractures from €3058 to €5992, and for multiple fractures from €4598 to €12,028. The average cost for overall fractures experienced a 110.3 % increase. The leading cause of health expenditure in the year following MOF was hospital admission. Expenditure in the second year post-fracture returned to pre-fracture levels. The use of some healthcare resources, especially visits to emergency services, increased in the prefracture month. Male sex, older age and high previous comorbidities were associated with a higher expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: In people with a first MOF, healthcare expenditure doubled during the first-year post-facture, mostly in relation to inpatient care. The healthcare resource use increased during the previous month. This increase could potentially be attributed to the worsening of pre-existing comorbidities.

A Delphi consensus on the management of Spanish patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: OSARIDELPHI study.

The OSARIDELPHI study evaluated the level of agreement between specialists in osteoporosis regarding the management of patients with high-risk fractures in Spain. The results provide expert-based recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment related to fracture risk. Therefore, the study facilitates clinical decision-making for managing this patient's profile. PURPOSE: To evaluate the level of agreement between specialists in osteoporosis regarding the management of patients with high-risk fractures in Spain. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was performed using an online survey. In round 1, panel members rated their level of agreement with assessments on a 9-point Likert scale. Item selection was based on acceptance by ≥ 66.6% of panel experts and the agreement of the scientific committee. In round 2, the same panelists evaluated non-consensus items in round 1. RESULTS: A total of 80 panelists participated in round 1; of these, 78 completed the round 2 survey. In round 1, 122 items from 4 dimensions (definition of fracture risk: 11 items, prevention and diagnosis: 38 items, choice of treatment: 24 items, and treatment-associated quality of life: 49 items) were evaluated. The consensus was reached for 90 items (73.8%). Panelists agreed that categorizing high risk, very high risk, or imminent risk determines secondary prevention actions (97.5%). Experts agreed that treatment with bone-forming drugs should be considered in case of a very high risk of fracture, and a sequential change to antiresorptive drugs should be made after 1-2 years (97.5%). Panelists also recommended corrective action plans for non-adherent patients to improve adherence (97.5%). A total of 131 items were finally accepted after round 2. CONCLUSION: This Delphi study provides expert-based recommendations on clinical decision-making for managing patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.

Ambulatory urine biomarkers associations with acute kidney injury and hospitalization in people with HIV.

BACKGROUND: People with HIV (PWH) generally have worse ambulatory levels of kidney injury biomarkers and excess risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to persons without HIV. We evaluated whether ambulatory measures of subclinical kidney injury among PWH are associated with subsequent AKI. METHODS: In the Predictors of Acute Renal Injury Study (PARIS), which enrolled 468 PWH from April 2016 to August 2019, we measured 10 urine biomarkers of kidney health (albumin, a1m, b2M, NGAL, IL18, KIM-1, EGF, UMOD, MCP-1, YKL40) at baseline and annually during follow-up. Using multivariable Cox regression models, we evaluated baseline and time-updated biomarker associations with the primary outcome of AKI (≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥1.5-times increase in serum creatinine from baseline) and secondary outcome of all-cause hospitalization. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age was 53 years old, and 45% self-identified as female. In time-updated models adjusting for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, albuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and HIV-associated factors, higher KIM-1 [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.30 per twofold higher; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.63] and NGAL concentrations (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.44) were associated with higher risk of hospitalized AKI. Additionally, in multivariable, time-updated models, higher levels of KIM-1 (HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.00, 1.41), NGAL (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26), and MCP-1 (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.00, 1.45) were associated with higher risk of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Urine biomarkers of kidney tubular injury, such as KIM-1 and NGAL, are strongly associated with AKI among PWH, and may hold potential for risk stratification of future AKI.

Situación de las Unidades de Recuperación Funcional en ortogeriatría según datos del Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera / Functional recovery units state in orthogeriatrics according to data from the National Registry of Hip Fracture

Introducción El Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) facilita el conocimiento del proceso de la fractura de cadera en España tanto para los clínicos como para los gestores y favorece la reducción de la variabilidad de los resultados encontrados incluyendo el destino al alta tras la fractura de cadera. Objetivo Describir la utilización de Unidades de Recuperación Funcional (URF) por parte de los pacientes con fractura de cadera incluidos en el RNFC y comparar los resultados entre las diferentes comunidades autónomas (CC.AA.). Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico de varios hospitales de España. Se analizaron los datos de una cohorte del RNFC de pacientes ingresados con fractura de cadera entre 2017 y 2022, centrándose en la ubicación al alta de los pacientes, en concreto en el traslado a URF. Resultados De una muestra de 52.215 pacientes procedentes de 105 hospitales, 9540 pacientes (18,1%) se trasladaron a URF al alta y 4595 (8,8%) permanecían en estas unidades 30 días después, con una distribución variable entre las distintas CC.AA. (0-49%) y con resultados variables en deterioro funcional a los 30 días (12,2-41,9%). Conclusiones En el paciente ortogeriátrico existe una disponibilidad y utilización desigual de las URF entre las distintas CC.AA. El estudio de la utilidad de este recurso puede ser de gran valor para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud (AU)

Introduction The National Registry of Hip Fractures (RNFC) facilitates knowledge of hip fracture process in Spain to clinicians and managers and is useful to the reduction of the results variability, including the destination at discharge after the hip fracture. Objective The aim of this study was to describe functional recovery units (URFs) use for patients with hip fracture included in the RNFC and to compare the results of the different autonomous communities (AC). Material and methods An observational, prospective and multicenter study of several hospitals in Spain. Data from a RNFC cohort of patients admitted with hip fracture between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed, focusing on the location at discharge of the patients, specifically on transfer to the URF. Results 52,215 patients from 105 hospitals were analyzed, 9540 patients (18.1%) were transferred to URF upon discharge and 4595 (8.8%) remained in these units 30 days later, with a variable distribution between the different AC (0–49%) and variability of results in patients not recovering ambulation at 30 days (12.2–41.9%). Conclusions There is in orthogeriatric patient an unequal availability and use of URFs between different autonomous communities. The study of the usefulness of this resource can be of great value for decision-making in health policies (AU)

[Functional recovery units state in orthogeriatrics according to data from the National Registry of Hip Fracture]. / Situación de las Unidades de Recuperación Funcional en ortogeriatría según datos del Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera.

INTRODUCTION: The National Registry of Hip Fractures (RNFC) facilitates knowledge of hip fracture process in Spain to clinicians and managers and is useful to the reduction of the results variability, including the destination at discharge after the hip fracture. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe functional recovery units (URFs) use for patients with hip fracture included in the RNFC and to compare the results of the different autonomous communities (AC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, prospective and multicenter study of several hospitals in Spain. Data from a RNFC cohort of patients admitted with hip fracture between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed, focusing on the location at discharge of the patients, specifically on transfer to the URF. RESULTS: 52,215 patients from 105 hospitals were analyzed, 9540 patients (18.1%) were transferred to URF upon discharge and 4595 (8.8%) remained in these units 30 days later, with a variable distribution between the different AC (0-49%) and variability of results in patients not recovering ambulation at 30 days (12.2-41.9%). CONCLUSIONS: There is in orthogeriatric patient an unequal availability and use of URFs between different autonomous communities. The study of the usefulness of this resource can be of great value for decision-making in health policies.

Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.

REFRA-FLS is a new registry in Spain aimed at identifying individuals over 50 years of age with a fragility fracture. Using this registry, we found hip fracture is the most prevalent fracture. Treatment for osteoporosis was 87.7%, with 65.3% adherence. REFRA-FLS provides fundamental data in the study of fragility fractures. PURPOSE: Fragility fractures are a growing public health concern in modern-aged societies. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been shown to successfully lower rates of secondary fractures. A new registry (REFRA-FLS) has been created to monitor quality indicators of FLS units in Spain and to explore the occurrence and characteristic of fragility fractures identified by these centers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study based on fragility fractures recorded in the REFRA-FLS registry. Participants were individuals 50 years or above who suffered a low energy fragility fracture identified by the 10 participating FLS units during the study period. The type of FLS unit, the characteristics of the individuals at baseline, along with patient outcomes as quality indicators among those who completed 1 year of follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2965 patients and 3067 fragility fractures were identified, and the most frequent locations were hip (n = 1709, 55.7%) and spine (n = 492, 16.0%). A total of 43 refractures (4.5%) and 46 deaths (4.9%) were observed among 948 individuals in the follow-up analyses. Time from fracture to evaluation was less than 3 months in 76.7% of individuals. Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed in 87.7%, and adherence was 65.3% in Morisky-Green test. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a comprehensive picture of fragility fractures identified in FLS units from Spain. Overall, quality indicators are satisfactory although a much higher use of DXA would be desirable. As the registry grows with the incorporation of new FLS units and longer follow-up, incoming analyses will provide valuable insight.

Adalimumab-Induced Lupus Nephritis: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors are known causative agents of systemic lupus erythemato- sus but have rarely been implicated in lupus nephritis. A patient with Crohn's disease on long-term adalimumab treatment presented with new-onset Raynaud's phenomenon and was found to have hematuria and proteinuria. Elevated antinuclear, anti-dsDNA, and MPO antibodies were found. A renal biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of lupus nephritis. Adalimumab was discontinued ensuing improvement in urine studies and resolution of dsDNA and MPO antibodies. Adalimumab can induce systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis.

The Effect of Mycophenolate Mofetil as First-Line Therapy on the Timing of Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio Reduction in Immunosuppressant-Naive Patients With Lupus Nephritis at a Single Center.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis (LN). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on the timing of urine protein-to-creatinine ratio reaching 200 mg or less after starting MMF as initial therapy for class III, IV, or V in immunosuppressant-naive patients with LN. METHODS: Patients who had a diagnosis of biopsy-proven LN were included in this cohort study. The initial dose of MMF was 1000 mg twice daily. If no improvement, it was increased to 1500 mg twice daily after 1 month. For statistical analysis, exact binomial distribution 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Nine patients were identified. There were 3 patients with class III, 3 with class IV, 1 with class III to V, 1 with class II to V, and 1 with class V lupus nephritis. The majority were African Americans (70%). At baseline, proteinuria ranged between 0.41 and 4 g, and 88% had normal estimated glomerular filtration rate. Forty-four percent of patients reached 0.28 g of proteinuria within 8 weeks of starting MMF (95% confidence interval, 14%-79%), all of which maintained the same level of response and normal estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months. Thirty-three percent of patients achieved the American College of Rheumatology complete response at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that only a minority of immunosuppressant-naive LN patients achieved the American College of Rheumatology complete response at 8 weeks after initiation of MMF. A rapid decline in the proteinuria to 0.28 g within the first 8 weeks of the treatment correlated strongly with achieving the same level of response at 12 months.

The Cancer Risk Profile of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients.

ABSTRACT: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have a well-established increased risk for cancer. Research from the past 2 decades has identified the specific malignancies that afflict SLE patients at disproportionate rates. Systemic lupus erythematosus patients are at heightened risk for several hematologic malignancies as well as for certain solid tumors, including lung, thyroid, and hepatobiliary cancers. They are at decreased risk for several cancers as well, including prostate and melanoma. Improved understanding of the unique cancer risk profile of SLE patients has led some professional societies to recommend specialized cancer screening and prevention measures for these patients and has enabled clinicians to better serve the SLE patient population.

The incidence of and risk factors for hospitalized acute kidney injury among people living with HIV on antiretroviral treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The epidemiology of hospitalized acute kidney injury (AKI) among people living with HIV (PLWH) in the era of modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all PLWH is not well characterized. We evaluated the incidence of and risk factors for hospitalized AKI from 2005 to 2015 among PLWH on ART. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of PLWH from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort. We defined hospitalized AKI as a rise of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL in serum creatinine (SCr) within any 48-h period or a 50% increase in SCr from baseline and assessed associations of risk factors with incident AKI using multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Most participants (75%) were black, 34% were female, and the mean age was 43 years. The incidence of AKI fluctuated annually, peaking at 40 per 1000 person-years (PY) [95% confidence interval (CI) 22-69 per 1000 PY] in 2007, and reached a nadir of 20 per 1000 PY (95% CI 11-34 per 1000 PY) in 2010. There was no significant temporal trend (-3.3% change per year; 95% CI -8.6 to 2.3%; P = 0.24). After multivariable adjustment, characteristics independently associated with AKI included black race [hazard ratio (HR) 2.44; 95% CI 1.42-4.20], hypertension (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.09-2.38), dipstick proteinuria > 1 (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.07-3.23), a history of AIDS (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.29-2.56), CD4 count < 200 cells/µL (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.02-2.07), and lower serum albumin (HR 1.73 per 1 g/dL decrease; 95% CI 1.02-2.07). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of PLWH, the annual incidence of first AKI fluctuated during the study period. Attention to modifiable AKI risk factors and social determinants of health may further reduce AKI incidence among PLWH.

[Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): First-year results and comparison with other registries and prospective multi-centric studies from Spain]. / Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC): resultados del primer año y comparación con otros registros y estudios multicéntricos españoles.

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera or RNFC) is a Spanish, prospective, multi- centric registry, commenced in 2017. The goal of this paper is to present the data from the first annual report and to compare them with autonomic registries and recent prospective multi-centric studies performed in Spain. METHODS: We included persons 75 years or older treated for fragility hip fractures in any of the centers participating in the RNFC between January and October 2017. The descriptive statistics of each variable used the mean (and standard deviation) or the median (and interquartile ranges) for the ordinal variables and the percentage for the categoric variables. A descriptive analysis of the casemix was performed and compared with available data from the aforementioned studies. RESULTS: The RNFC included 7.208 patients from 54 hospitals, with a mean age of 86.7 (SD 5.6) years; 75.4% were women, and 36.4% showed cognitive decline. Mean surgical delay was 75.7 (SD 63.6) hours, and length of stay averaged 10.9 (SD 6.7) days. Of the patients who lived at home (75.4%), less than half (37.0%) returned home at discharge. One-month mortality was 7.1%. Comparison with other studies showed important differences, especially regarding patients newly sent to nursing homes (7.7-29.4%) and with antiosteoporotic treatment at discharge (14.5-36.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The RNFC is the largest prospective database to date that offers data regarding the characteristics of patients hospitalized for hip fractures in Spain. Comparison with recent studies showed some important differences.

OBJETIVO: El Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) es un registro español multicéntrico, prospectivo y continuo, que comenzó en 2017. El objetivo de este artículo fue presentar los datos del primer informe anual y compararlos con los registros autonómicos y los estudios multicéntricos realizados recientemente en España. METODOS: Se incluyeron las personas de 75 años o más atendidas con el diagnóstico de fractura de cadera por fragilidad en alguno de los hospitales participantes en el RNFC, entre enero y octubre de 2017. En el análisis estadístico se utilizó la media y desviación estándar o mediana y rangos intercuartílicos para las variables numéricas y los porcentajes para las variables categóricas. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo global de la casuística y se comparó con los datos disponibles de los estudios previos mencionados. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 7.208 personas de 54 hospitales, con una edad media de 86,7 años (DE 5,6). El 75,4% fueron mujeres y el 36,4% presentaron deterioro cognitivo previo. La demora quirúrgica media fue de 75,7 horas (DE 63,6) y la estancia media fue de 10,9 días (DE 6,7). De las personas que vivían en un domicilio antes de la fractura (75,4%), menos de la mitad (37,0%) volvieron a él tras el alta hospitalaria. Al mes, había fallecido el 7,1%. La comparación con los otros estudios mostró algunas diferencias importantes, sobre todo en la ubicación previa, en el porcentaje de pacientes institucionalizados de novo (7,7-29,4%) y en el porcentaje con tratamiento antiosteoporótico al alta (14,5-36,7%). CONCLUSIONES: El RNFC es la mayor base de datos prospectiva que aporta datos sobre el perfil de los pacientes hospitalizados por fractura de cadera en España. La comparación con otros estudios recientes muestra algunas diferencias importantes.

Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC): resultados del primer año y comparación con otros registros y estudios multicéntricos españoles / Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC):First-year results and comparison with other registries and prospective multi-centric studies from Spain

OBJETIVO: El Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) es un registro español multicéntrico, prospectivo y continuo, que comenzó en 2017. El objetivo de este artículo fue presentar los datos del primer informe anual y compararlos con los registros autonómicos y los estudios multicéntricos realizados recientemente en España. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron las personas de 75 años o más atendidas con el diagnóstico de fractura de cadera por fragilidad en alguno de los hospitales participantes en el RNFC, entre enero y octubre de 2017. En el análisis estadístico se utilizó la media y desviación estándar o mediana y rangos intercuartílicos para las variables numéricas y los porcentajes para las variables categóricas. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo global de la casuística y se comparó con los datos disponibles de los estudios previos mencionados. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 7.208 personas de 54 hospitales, con una edad media de 86,7 años (DE 5,6). El 75,4% fueron mujeres y el 36,4% presentaron deterioro cognitivo previo. La demora quirúrgica media fue de 75,7 horas (DE 63,6) y la estancia media fue de 10,9 días (DE 6,7). De las personas que vivían en un domicilio antes de la fractura (75,4%), menos de la mitad (37,0%) volvieron a él tras el alta hospitalaria. Al mes, había fallecido el 7,1%. La comparación con los otros estudios mostró algunas diferencias importantes, sobre todo en la ubicación previa, en el porcentaje de pacientes institucionalizados de novo (7,7-29,4%) y en el porcentaje con tratamiento antiosteoporótico al alta (14,5-36,7%). CONCLUSIONES: El RNFC es la mayor base de datos prospectiva que aporta datos sobre el perfil de los pacientes hospitalizados por fractura de cadera en España. La comparación con otros estudios recientes muestra algunas diferencias importantes

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera or RNFC) is a Spanish, prospective, multi-centric registry, commenced in 2017. The goal of this paper is to present the data from the first annual report and to compare them with autonomic registries and recent prospective multi-centric studies performed in Spain. METHODS: We included persons 75 years or older treated for fragility hip fractures in any of the centers participating in the RNFC between January and October 2017. The descriptive statistics of each variable used the mean (and standard deviation) or the median (and interquartile ranges) for the ordinal variables and the percentage for the categoric variables. A descriptive analysis of the casemix was performed and compared with available data from the aforementioned studies. RESULTS: The RNFC included 7.208 patients from 54 hospitals, with a mean age of 86.7 (SD 5.6) years; 75.4% were women, and 36.4% showed cognitive decline. Mean surgical delay was 75.7 (SD 63.6) hours, and length of stay averaged 10.9 (SD 6.7) days. Of the patients who lived at home (75.4%), less than half (37.0%) returned home at discharge. One-month mortality was 7.1%. Comparison with other studies showed important differences, especially regarding patients newly sent to nursing homes (7.7-29.4%) and with antiosteoporotic treatment at discharge (14.5-36.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The RNFC is the largest prospective database to date that offers data regarding the characteristics of patients hospitalized for hip fractures in Spain. Comparison with recent studies showed some important differences

Correction: Patterns of sedentary behavior in overweight and moderately obese users of the Catalan primary-health care system.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190750.].

Patterns of sedentary behavior in overweight and moderately obese users of the Catalan primary-health care system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prolonged sitting time (ST) has negative consequences on health. Changing this behavior is paramount in overweight/obese individuals because they are more sedentary than those with normal weight. The aim of the study was to establish the pattern of sedentary behavior and its relationship to health, socio-demographics, occupation, and education level in Catalan overweight/obese individuals. METHODS: A descriptive study was performed at 25 healthcare centers in Catalonia (Spain) with 464 overweight/moderately obese patients, aged25 to 65 years. Exclusion criteria were chronic diseases which contraindicated physical activity and language barriers. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to collect data on age, gender, educational level, social class, and marital status. Main outcome was 'sitting time' (collected by the Marshall questionnaire); chronic diseases and anthropometric measurements were registered. RESULTS: 464 patients, 58.4% women, mean age 51.9 years (SD 10.1), 76.1% married, 60% manual workers, and 48.7% had finished secondary education. Daily sitting time was 6.2 hours on working days (374 minutes/day, SD: 190), and about 6 hours on non-working ones (357 minutes/day, SD: 170). 50% of participants were sedentary ≥6 hours. The most frequent sedentary activities were: working/academic activities around 2 hours (128 minutes, SD: 183), followed by watching television, computer use, and commuting. Men sat longer than women (64 minutes more on working days and 54 minutes on non-working days), and individuals with office jobs (91 minutes),those with higher levels of education (42 minutes), and younger subjects (25 to 35 years) spent more time sitting. CONCLUSIONS: In our study performed in overweight/moderately obese patients the mean sitting time was around 6 hours which was mainly spent doing work/academic activities and watching television. Men, office workers, individuals with higher education, and younger subjects had longer sitting time. Our results may help design interventions targeted at these sedentary patients to decrease sitting time.

Predictors of Acute Renal Injury Study (PARIS) among HIV-positive individuals: design and methods.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI), which is common among HIV-positive individuals, may contribute to the excess burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in this patient population; however, conventional clinical methods to detect AKI do not capture kidney injury sufficiently early to prevent irreversible damage. Further, large observational and interventional studies of AKI generally exclude HIV-positive persons in spite of their disproportionate risk. METHODS: The Predictors of Acute Renal Injury Study (PARIS) is a prospective observational cohort study among HIV-positive individuals established to determine the ability of candidate kidney injury biomarkers to predict future hospitalized clinical AKI, to characterize hospitalized subclinical AKI, and to discern the risk of progressive kidney disease following subclinical and clinical AKI. Among the candidate kidney injury markers, we will select the most promising to translate into a clinically viable, multiplex panel of urinary biomarkers which we will integrate with clinical factors to develop a model prognostic of risks for AKI and subsequent kidney function decline. This study has a targeted enrollment of 2000 participants. The overall follow-up of participants consists of two phases: 1) a 5-year active follow-up phase which involves serial evaluations at enrollment, annual clinic visits, and among participants who are hospitalized during this period, an evaluation at index hospitalization and 3 and 12 months post-hospitalization; and 2) a subsequent passive follow-up phase for the duration that the participant receives medical care at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. DISCUSSIONS: This study will serve as an important resource for future studies of AKI by establishing a repository with both ambulatory and inpatient biospecimens, a resource that is currently lacking in existing HIV clinical cohorts and studies of AKI. Upon completion of this study, the resulting prognostic model which will incorporate results from the multiplex HIV-AKI Risk Pane could serve as a pharmacodynamic endpoint for early phase therapeutic candidates for AKI.

Smokefree legislation effects on respiratory and sensory disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesize the available evidence in scientific papers of smokefree legislation effects on respiratory diseases and sensory and respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, red eyes, runny nose) among all populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. A search between January 1995 and February 2015 was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) original scientific studies about smokefree legislation, 2) Data before and after legislation were collected, and 3) Impact on respiratory and sensory outcomes were assessed. Paired reviewers independently carried out the screening of titles and abstracts, data extraction from full-text articles, and methodological quality assessment. RESULTS: A total number of 1606 papers were identified. 50 papers were selected, 26 were related to symptoms (23 concerned workers). Most outcomes presented significant decreases in the percentage of people suffering from them, especially in locations with comprehensive measures and during the immediate post-ban period (within the first six months). Four (50%) of the papers concerning pulmonary function reported some significant improvement in expiratory parameters. Significant decreases were described in 13 of the 17 papers evaluating asthma hospital admissions, and there were fewer significant reductions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admissions (range 1-36%) than for asthma (5-31%). Six studies regarding different respiratory diseases showed discrepant results, and four papers about mortality reported significant declines in subgroups. Low bias risk was present in 23 (46%) of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Smokefree legislation appears to improve respiratory and sensory symptoms at short term in workers (the overall effect being greater in comprehensive smokefree legislation in sensory symptoms) and, to a lesser degree, rates of hospitalization for asthma.